We've heard a lot of contradictory testimony or statements at committee here. We heard from some witnesses that there was not a failure of inspection, that there was really nothing that could have been done in terms the requirements and expectations. We've heard from others that we need twice as many inspectors on the floor—that's the solution to the whole problem. We've heard that we need better data analysis over the long run to be able to see trends. We've heard that we need visual inspection, that it's really the key to what's going on here. I guess I'd like to get your reaction to that.
I also want to ask, Mr. Stein, as you're an expert in this, was it a mistake to cancel environmental testing in 2005? Is that something that would have helped prevent what happened last year? And you support the changes that were made on April 1, from what you said earlier. Is that correct?