The question of who has the obligation to point out particular test results is certainly an issue, but the test data were made available. We cannot comment on the allocation of an individual inspector's time and their additional responsibilities, but we can comment on the fact that they have an obligation and were at our facility each and every day. How long during the day they were there is another matter. But they were present in our facility each and every day, by law, when we were producing. There is a presence there daily regardless of how they allocate their resources.
I think the most important question in enhancing food safety has to do with how you interpret the data. Going back to first principles, we were collecting these data without being under any obligation to do so. There's no regulation requiring us to collect the data in the first instance—there never has been in the history of food processing. When you're not required to collect something, it tends to colour your sensitivity to interpreting it.
Finally, given the mandate that we believe is appropriate for the CFIA, for the government and regulator going forward, we would share your view that more resources are required, not less. But that is not for us to decide.