Thank you very much.
Let me start with the issue of a minimum standard to trigger concern, because it is an extremely important consideration.
My colleague earlier noted that what we seek to do is to be in a position to provide information to Canadians that allows them to take action in their own interest. In order to do that, there is a certain minimum amount of information that we need. We need to be able to point them to a food that we have a reasonable certainty is associated, so that we don't modify behaviour in a way that might have negative consequences for the public. That becomes very important, and frankly characterizes our minimum standard.
What that means is, once informed on the 6th, we launched multiple lines of inquiry in order to reach that point, that minimum standard, that would allow us to communicate that to Canadians. Unfortunately, the information we received on the 6th didn't specifically identify the products associated with the sample, as you heard Brian explain. That was the focus, in fact, of our investigative activities, to get to a point where we could rule out contamination in the preparation facility and identify, if indeed a particular plant was involved, what particular products, so that Canadians could be informed. That is the minimum standard.