I will try to be more succinct than I was last time.
First of all, I agree with you. I think there is room for improvement in any system, and we are working on that. When we look at consumers' priorities, and their concerns about food, food safety is always at the top of the list.
You were talking about chocolate milk from China. With the trade liberalization that has happened as a result of globalization, it is obvious that we will face more and more risks, often from developing countries. On the other hand, we cannot test everything either. We cannot necessary do tests to detect melamine, for example. Tests are done on a random basis, but that is no easy matter either. We cannot do tests for 2,000, 3,000 or 4,000 chemicals or other substances. That would not be possible.
Let's talk about ways of improving the system. There is one thing I find deplorable. Let's take your story about chocolate milk. We noticed the problem, and we asked the agency to follow up, to inspect the product, etc. I can only assume that it did so, but I really have no idea whether this was done. It might be good if there were greater transparency in following up on complaints or concerns in an industry. We do that to try to protect consumers. I understand that there are some trade considerations, but it would be nice to know whether anyone saw this as a problem, whether the agency followed up and settled the matter. Otherwise, we can only wait until the product is no longer on the shelves, which would be an indication that someone had followed up on the complaint. There might be room for improvement in this regard.