It sounds like Dr. Williams' conclusions are very close to yours in terms of clarifying the roles. They needed to strengthen their laboratory capacity, probably because you don't, and improve communications. As my colleague said, what we learned from SARS was collaboration, cooperation, communication, and clarity of who does what when. That was in Dr. Naylor's report, and somehow it didn't happen this time.
I'm concerned that in the chronology and what you've said is that once it hits the food chain and there is illness or possible illness or the potential of adverse publicity, all of a sudden the communication slows down in some way. I was wondering how you can sort of demonstrate that for us in real time in the real cases. Is there something that would just show us that you would have expected that? Do you use IFIS, and would you not expect things to be posted there as soon as they see anything? Did that not happen this time?