I can give you several examples. We get the same information the public gets with recalls, so whatever public notice is given, that's the information we receive. We don't receive any other information regarding, say, bacterial species, or any fingerprint information, or on distribution of the product. Whatever the public sees is what we see. If we want additional information that could be useful for outbreak investigations, we have to ask for it. Sometimes we get it, sometimes we don't. If we do get it, it will be delayed. And any delay in an outbreak investigation potentially means that more people will become ill, there will be secondary infections, etc. That's one thing.
Another example is there are certain recalls that are not publicized that we're aware of. These may be recalls that are a result of bacterial test results that a company may have done, or test results that the CFIA may have done. The CFIA--and I'm not sure what the reasoning is--do not publicize these recalls. These could be products that were distributed to institutions only, or only to restaurants. I'm speculating here, but I guess they figure there is no reason to tell the public. If they don't tell the public, we don't find out about it either. That's another example. Again, for potential outbreak investigations, that could be very useful. We could have an outbreak occurring and we wouldn't know the cause of it, but if we had that information we would be able to act.
Those are two specific examples. I can give you other ones that have happened as well.