I'm simply looking at the raw numbers, and I don't see an absolute decline. The numbers may indeed be settling, and people might look at them and get into somewhat of a risk aversion pattern. They might say that it's not too bad, that it's an acceptable risk. But if you talk to the families of the 22 people who died last year, this wouldn't be an acceptable risk. To see this downward pattern in what mathematicians call an “absolute zero” context is not wholly accurate.
One of the other things you talked about has always interested me, and it's not the first time we've heard it. This has to do with industry standards. We all set the bar to different places. One thing for sure is that the government standard is the floor. I'm not upset by this perspective. The industry standards are higher. They're not climbing up to the floor—they're above the floor. This prompts the question: why is the government standard so much lower than industry's? If the industry is the leader, and food safety is the responsibility of the industry, why doesn't the government catch up to your standards?