If you go back to “if we had been there”, I think it has as much to do with “if the policy had been there”. The environmental testing that was removed in 2005—I'm sure you know this, but maybe you don't--did not require, to my understanding, Maple Leaf or any other plant to actually, when they took the swabs, make a mandatory report. The previous government cancelled the environmental testing. So what Maple Leaf was able to do was take tests, and sometimes it showed up and sometimes it didn't. If it didn't, it went in a file and went on the shelf.
I am asking you the question. We instituted and brought back the environmental testing. It was a recommendation. It was a critical part of prevention. Do you agree with that?