I would look at it in that light, that if they were having the in-depth review, the in-depth review team would look at a number of records dating back, in that instance, maybe six months to a year. While they're reviewing those records, if any areas are unclear to the auditors, they may ask the inspector for clarification as to what he meant on a report and they may have instructed him just to put those clarifying notes on the report. My understanding was that those reports were dated the day it happened, so the inspector was not trying to hide anything.
On May 25th, 2009. See this statement in context.