Excellent.
I have a specific case to talk about with respect to second language training. You alluded to it as well, and it's on page 4 of your opening remarks.
I have a specific case. Someone came to my office and gave an example of an individual he knew of who had limited French—very intermediary French, speaking, writing, and oral abilities—and wanted an executive position. He realized that in order to do this he needed to get second language training, but there was a two-year backlog. I found this difficult to believe, but he said that was the case. Then he had his assessment done from the House of Commons, but the oral component was not accepted by the Public Service Commission.
First, for clarification, is there a two-year backlog? Second, is it also true that the assessment conducted by the House of Commons for oral French-speaking skills, or second language skills, is not accepted by the Public Service Commission?