I have to first of all qualify what I said by saying that I haven't studied this, so I don't talk from having researched the area; therefore, I'm loath to make sweeping statements.
But I can understand a position that says, “I don't see the payback, economically,” or “If it's so long in the future, because I'm going to make better decisions, when I have some higher-priority spending decisions that I have to make.... Is it broken, what I'm doing now? If it's not broken, why should I fix it? Because it's going to cost me. It may not be significant, may not be material in terms of the total government budget, but prove to me that it is going to make better decisions.”
That is so long term and it depends on so many other things that I would say it's not just attitudinal. There is also that particular question, which I think probably needs to be answered.
But I qualify once again, Mr. Kramp, that I haven't studied it and I haven't researched it, so it's more of an impression than actual knowledge, and I may stand to be corrected.