I reject the premise of the question, because I think we did lead by example in the directions I mentioned earlier. I think the internal savings are important.
The previous government led an expenditure reduction exercise that identified some $12 billion in internal operations. In many respects, they might have overreached and booked what I would call phantom savings—a “don't worry, be happy” type of expenditure reduction exercise. We have to constantly ensure that the reductions are doable. We wanted to ensure that we met reductions—