We have only eight minutes for this round, so let me respond to the first two examples you listed.
The cuts, for example, at Status of Women Canada are on the administration side, not on the grants and contributions side. I think if you look at the ratio of administration to the grants and contributions side, it would probably be among the highest in the public sector. We want to focus on results, so rather than making the easy decision of cutting the grant budget, we wanted to ensure that we have a more streamlined administration. There are very few departments of that size, if any, that have the type of regional operation that it does, for such a small budget.
I'm not sure if all of the cuts that were made by the member for LaSalle—Émard in 1995 have been reinstated. I'm not sure if it has been brought up to the level that he inherited. But with respect to aboriginal people, yes, we eliminated the aboriginal effort to combat smoking. Smoking cessation efforts were not successful in that regard, and that's what we were spending public dollars on. We measure our commitment not on how much money we spend, but on the results that we get, and the Minister of Health will be coming forward with a program that will hopefully actually lead to smoking cessations for the market they're targeting.