For me, it's hard to speak to that in your environment. I really would need to know it better, and I don't think I do. But again, that decision, that question, came up in British Columbia, and we purposely, based on our circumstances, said no, we need a three-year plan. I know at that time my auditor--now I am the auditor--said it should be faster, but in the end, for B.C., that was the right solution--but not a plan that was so long that it didn't seem to have the imperative. So it's a balance act. You need a plan that's challenging but that you can prove is realistic. Three years was good enough.
On October 26th, 2006. See this statement in context.