Thank you.
We know that there are obviously investments that have to be made in terms of the transition. It's a multi-year plan, it's new software, it's training, it's additional accounting staff, and so on. Would you say, over the long haul, once the transition is completed, that the accrual approach is more costly to run, that the accounting costs are higher than the cash accounting approach?
We're happy to keep accountants employed, I must say, but I'm just wondering, is it a more labour-intensive accounting approach, and does it take up more staff time than other approaches?
It's not a trick question.