Yes, because at first sight, probably a number of us would go toward the statutory amortization simply because generally things are amortized over a certain length of time, and we don't want governments starting to manipulate the numbers and having the flexibility to massage things. I think that's the concern, that if we don't go to statutory, governments might have the flexibility, but if we do go to statutory, then we might not be able to get a clear picture of the amortization situation.
On November 7th, 2006. See this statement in context.