He was very specific. I got into the whole question then about federally owned buildings. There's a $4 billion liability that's generally accepted throughout the civil service, and I think most parliamentarians have heard that.
His assessment on both the environmental side and the infrastructure side was that we should not document with accrual accounting within generally accepted standards until there has been a contract with somebody to spend the money. That was his testimony.
I'm wondering if you would differ with him on that testimony.