I understand that, but we are taking it for granted that the actual depreciation, or amortization, or consumption is going to become statutory if we decide to go that way. So it's an automatic approval for Parliament if we go that way, because once the government has committed to purchase that project or that program, the consumption is an automatic thing.
I'm still at a loss. If the government made a commitment for that $100 million, I know the program has to be implemented over a period of two years, but the consumption will be taken over a period of 10 years after that. Why couldn't we just approve the project at that year?
To me it seems if we're going to accrual, the essence of accrual is that we take into account the overall costs of the project the minute we commit to that project. If we claim to take accrual but still vote on a cash basis, we're really still not using the accrual system.