I'm sure there's a way to do it. I would think that government officials are probably.... But if you look at the example even that's given of the environmental liability, essentially there's a recognition of a liability that's only going to be paid several years out. It's analogous. It's always a liability rather than an asset, but there's an economic decision being made. How the cash then flows can be quite different from the actual timing of that decision. The parliamentary votes, of course, are now all based on cash, but I think you can miss some of these large decisions that are being made if you're only focusing on the cash. So in the case of the environmental liability, if there's a commitment made to fund a project or something in two or three years from now, the commitment has been signed, but the cash may not flow immediately.
On November 7th, 2006. See this statement in context.