What would water management have to do with HRSDC, for example? Wouldn't the policy framework, whether it's aging or environmental or economic, be the foundation from which a lot of decisions of many different departments would follow? Therefore, wouldn't it make more sense in the aboriginal situation...? Again it does cross a lot of departments, and we just spent a bit of time talking about cross-department coordination and trying to execute a government's policy agenda.
With respect to the transfer of those areas I've mentioned, and there are a few more that I can talk about, wouldn't that in fact decentralize it in a way that it no longer would have the coordination that you're seeking, especially on the policy front, such as socio-economic trends and water management? That absolutely connects with many different departments. Why would it be in HRSDC, or why would it be aboriginal affairs that goes completely into Indian Affairs? It does connect with other departments. For example, it connects with HRSDC in their spending on children's services, for example, especially aboriginal young people and children. It connects with their budget and their implementation of their policies. Wouldn't having this pulled out from the PCO impact on other departments, so that in fact there would be even more silos rather than a clear coordination?