The short answer is no, the estimates do not contemplate specific penalties. I think it's important to expand on that, in the sense that all of the major transfers to provinces or to individuals are in fact paid according to statutory authority. So any plan a government would have to change fundamentally those payments would need to come to Parliament, not through the estimates but through an actual bill, to change. The equalization program changed a few years ago, the CHST program changed into the CHTCST. Those require specific legislative changes and Parliament votes on those. For the purposes of the estimates on that two-thirds of spending, when you add in the $34 billion debt service, we are simply informing Parliament that past laws that it has passed are giving effect to that amount of spending.
Any other payments that might be made through a grant and contribution program, for example, must be listed to a specific payee or what we would call a class grant or contribution program. Again, Parliament will pay on that. A government that makes a decision to go to Parliament and make a change to no longer continue with a program or to add a program must take account of all consequences. Parliament reviews that, but the estimates build in no notion of penalties or compensation other than what a government might choose specifically as a policy decision to put in place.