I think two things are relevant. First of all, it is an individual minister who's attesting, but importantly, this instrument dates back to the 1860s. Financial administration acts over the 140-year period since then have added certain kinds of uses.
But since the 1890s, I believe it is, it has been considered in the Financial Administration Act that the normal core ongoing operations of government are eligible uses for Governor General's special warrants. So that otherwise put, the Financial Administration Act does not contemplate that provisions of standard core services provided by the Government of Canada would need to be disrupted because of supply being disrupted by Parliament. An individual minister still does need to attest that their interpretation of core operations of the government meets that test.