Okay. Slipping over to IT technology now, I can recall, just as an example, that I put a small IT system into a small business I was involved with. I could have picked up the software for about $4,000 or $5,000, but I said, no, I want something personal that is really going to give me the results I want and need. Of course, before I knew it, I'd spent $50,000. I said, my goodness. It didn't work effectively, so I went back and put in the $4,000 one, and it is still working to this day in a magnificent fashion.
Do we have some parallels to that simple parable in our IT acquisitions? I think we have seven systems. You've identified five that have not exactly been successful. I don't know if I have that number right, but there are a number of them that are not performing to the level they should.
Are we trying to be too inventive, and can we not go out to other jurisdictions where technology is now available off the shelf—tried, tested, true, and ready to go—and not go through such a waste of capital, time, and manpower?