Knowing that it is quite a daunting challenge, are you personally in favour of the easy, trickle-in approach? Or, as an example, British Columbia, when they were here, said, let's just do it, and they went whole hog. They made a major transformation all at once. They thought, let's get the pain over with. They'd have that initial cost, but it wouldn't be dragging on and on. In other words, it wouldn't be a 10-year process. They could probably do it one, two, three, or four years. What are your thoughts on that?
