I know I can ask the Department of Public Works this question, but I'll ask you, because maybe you can help me with a shortcut here.
Ever since I was first elected, back in 2000, there has always been a private member's bill—or 10—before the House, where somebody is saying they're going to have their local post office or their local whatever declared a heritage site.
I guess this is a two-part question. One, is it your sense that it is too easy in Canada for sites to be recognized as heritage sites, and then, therefore, you have all the—?
I know, for example, in my riding, Terry Fox is buried in a very quaint, cute, small cemetery that's actually quite humbling for a real Canadian hero. It's actually a neat place. I looked at the idea of getting it declared a heritage site. I was shocked at just how easily that's done. And then, commensurate with that recognition comes all kinds of funding responsibilities, upkeep responsibilities, designation responsibilities, and notification responsibilities to the federal government. I was really surprised at how easily a heavy burden can be brought to the federal government by a quick act of Parliament through a private member's bill or motion. Do you think this process is too easy?
Two—and then I guess I'm out of time here—relative to other jurisdictions, do you know how many heritage sites we have? I don't know if you do it on a per capita basis or how it might be done. Are we way over our proportionate number of heritage sites compared to other countries? Would you know that number?