Once Mr. Moore gets off his high horse, he'll recall that Mr. Morgan was unable--note the word “unable”--to address any question related to competence and knowledge of an appointments process. Nor was he capable of offering any systematic procedural approach to what he thinks he should be doing. And thirdly, he was unaware of the competence associated with any merit-based system.
So I think that Madam Nash, who decided not to call into question any other perceived notions about his abilities in the private sector, noted that the commentary around the table, reinforced by Mr. Moore and his colleagues, was that he is really quite unsuitable for making decisions and observations, let alone that he doesn't have the qualifications and competence for the procedure that he has yet to define.
I think that Madam Nash has actually done Mr. Morgan a favour by referring to his suitability and not his competence. That's not partisanship. I think that's a certain elegance and compassion on her part.