I guess there are a couple of things to respond to there.
I think the problem is much bigger than senior leadership, and it's bigger than what is traditionally called “knowledge workers”. I think the problem extends to a whole series of other segments of the federal public service workforce.
There are other kinds of skills—skilled trades we've already talked about a little bit—where the current strategies and programs, I think we're convinced, won't solve the problem and more needs to be done. We've suggested an apprenticeship program in the area of the skilled trades as one solution for that particular group.
There's also an area of administrative knowledge. A lot of administrative work gets done in the federal public service. If you go through too rapid a change, the corporate knowledge disappears. We think the solution of temporary help agencies, as a quick-fix solution to shortages, is a problematic one.
There are a lot of people who would like to work for the federal public service. If we're getting 200 applicants per job, that's a good thing. If more attention was paid to fulfilling the long-term staffing needs as opposed to just temporary solutions, we'd have more jobs open than are currently open and the number of applicants per job might go down. We might not have 200 people per job. We might have a smaller number because we're actually filling the jobs permanently more quickly.