Okay. That seems reasonable, I think, from the perspective of those involved in this--from the banks' perspective, for example--to have these nine buildings at such a large amount and see the potential for future offerings. That's certainly quite attractive, and I would think something that could be quite lucrative, potentially, for the banks that are involved in this.
I raise this, Mr. Minister, because of course it's been raised in the media that one of the people involved in this, from the Bank of Montreal, is someone quite well known to you. He's a Conservative Party fundraiser, organizer, and former candidate. He supported your leadership when you ran for the leadership of the party, and supported the former Minister of Public Works. I think people wonder, then, about the details of the sale.
I guess the concern is that we don't have the study that was used to justify the sale in terms of it being a good deal for Canadians. That's still an open question. Because it is such a long-term lease, I guess it's a fair question: is it in the interest of Canadians? We don't have disclosure of the contract with the banks. We don't know what their gain will be. We don't know who chose these two banks to handle this deal. And while you're talking about a fairness assessment, we don't yet have that.
Which of these documents are we going to be able to get? Will we get the fairness assessment over time so that any and all questions about this will be answered?