Again, I don't think this should be argued as a real estate case. It should be argued more on what makes the best business decision. Also, though, I would say one of the things government should take into account in where it builds are some of the policy issues of urban regeneration, etc., that would assist.
I wouldn't necessarily say that government building buildings on cheap land that it owns might not be the best. It may be appropriate, but I don't think that would be the driver. It should put the building where it can do the best job of delivering the public service.