Thank you.
Perhaps I can get back to my third question, Mr. Antoine St-Jean.
The fact remains that money was spent without parliamentary approval. Parliament was misled. Outside of Parliament that's fraud. It's totally misrepresenting expenditures. I have two concerns.
Number one, I'm really pleased to see the accounting methods and the levels of control that you have implemented now to ensure this doesn't happen again. You just went through a number of them in a previous question. If possible, I'd like this committee to have a written copy of the responses that you have taken to this file, so we would be able to have a further evaluation and hopefully be assured that will provide a solution so this doesn't happen again in the future. That would the one point.
The second point, though, that I'd like to take on this is, who bears responsibility? Mr. Bonin made a very good question: where does the buck stop? We can recall dealing with public accounts before. Is this ministerial responsibility? Is it deputy ministerial responsibility, and which minister's responsibility? Does the responsibility come back on your shoulders? Wrong decisions were made. Improper, potentially illegal decisions were made. Who bears the cross for this?