When I look at the system—and you were talking about the legislation, the resistance to it, etc.—was the contractor building in any contingency allowing for some permutation or combination in a complex system like this, where there has to be some leeway given?
That leads to my next question about when the system was in its delay and development mode, when that $21.8 million was incurred. Was there any arrangement with the contractor when you started doing the RFP bid? You've probably worked with the government systems so often that you know what goes on. Was it there?
I'm just trying to get a handle on it, so that when we go forward, our job as parliamentarians of ensuring there is efficiency is met and we look after taxpayers' dollars well. So give us an idea of what happened.