If you realized the government owns that building now, it would perhaps help you to understand. The Royal Bank is simply a tenant under an existing lease in that building. That lease has been in place for a number of years. It is in place now. As per the terms of that lease, it will remain in place for a number of years. There will be no change as a result of this transaction, so there's no opportunity for what you call a “sweet deal”. The deal was negotiated quite some time ago, without us being involved.
On May 29th, 2007. See this statement in context.