First of all, we appear to have lost $100 million from the last member's estimate of value. But the fact is that the values that were in the paper have very little, if any, relevance to real market. As an example, there are certain assets, I know, that the government acquired that were empty. They would have had certain values at that point in time, and at that point in time in the market, there's no question that the value of the buildings with the government as an occupant paying rent was significantly greater and therefore different from the “market value” that an appraiser might apply under different circumstances if you were not an occupant and tenant under the lease term.
So I think we're dealing with the analogy of the apples and oranges in terms of trying to compare value of one versus the other, if I understood your question.