I think part of the process that we've explained is the capital repairs. In the case you mentioned—I think you said $4 million—part of the obligation is being passed over to the new purchaser to undertake. That's part of the reason for carrying out this exercise. At the same time, as time goes by, ongoing maintenance and repairs would be carried out by the landlord. Yes, you as a tenant would be paying certain funds towards them, but they would be done more efficiently, in our opinion, than the government has been doing the repairs to its buildings up to now.
On May 29th, 2007. See this statement in context.