If I may, Monsieur Bonin is not far from where Madame Bourgeois was maybe 10 minutes ago. We always say “information” and so on, using very vague terms here. If committee members are looking for precise questions and precise information, that's fine, but information to ease Ms. Nash's mind may be something very different from what would ease another's mind, or Mr. Turner's mind. And that's fine. Frankly, we're almost debating here entirely out of vacuous understanding of what it is we're dealing with here.
If committee members want to put together a list, as Madame Bourgeois just suggested, of very precise questions--about commissions, about timelines, about dates, about when RFPs are going to be going forward, and so on--then put together a list of very precise questions. If this committee is actually suggesting that the federal government should put a cease on what we are already in the process of doing, then I think that is a political statement rather than an information-searching decision about whether or not this is, as Ray Simard said, in the best interests of taxpayers.
So if committee members want to get a very specific list of questions, then let's do that.