What you've just said is very interesting.
Ms. Jauvin, from the Public Service Human Resources Management Agency of Canada, emphasized that the Treasury Board wanted to put forward four priorities. One of them was to have integrated planning, and thus to know whether a specific situation requires that the public service adapt to it in the short or medium term. That solution was put forward at that point, but no planning was developed.
What do you think about the fact that the administration of a federal government, which is significant in terms of services to the public, does not have a permanent audit and counter-audit plan to ensure that needs are met? What advice would you give the Canadian government for being proactive and positive, for identifying significant factors in order to meet needs which suddenly seem glaring in some and perhaps less so in others, but which are predictable for the future?