Madam Chair, the member is absolutely correct. This is the example that I gave for alternative dispute resolution, where it would not fit squarely within a contravention of the act, of the regulation, of the code, or a serious breach, abuse of funds, gross mismanagement, and also when there's a specific threat to the health, safety, and security of individuals and the environment, as I recall the legislation--and of course, anybody who encourages those specific breaches.
So the legislation is very specific as to what falls under the definition of wrongdoing, but often the complainant does not know, when he or she comes forward, whether his or her complaint falls within that definition. This is where I think there would be also another benefit to the function, as we lead the individuals to alternative dispute resolution. Maybe there's no wrongdoing, but there has been a mistake or there has been a wrong that could be corrected, nonetheless, even though through the alternative dispute resolution by mutual agreement.