Perhaps I could interrupt you just for a second and slip back to the Auditor General.
You appear to be semi-comfortable with the status of your information system, and yet the Auditor General in a report basically says the systems do not provide the information or allow the input that would enable managers to make well-informed decisions.
We can't have it both ways. You can't be semi-satisfied, and the Auditor General can't basically say you don't have the information to make intelligent, capable decisions. Where's the saw-off here?