I know, but the question is whether or not that debate is taking place for the purposes of obstructing the business of the committee, or whether that debate is legitimate. I didn't make a point of order because we'd just finished debating the entire motion, not just the amendment. I allowed that to go on without making a point of order, because I explicitly and implicitly understood that we were having the whole debate on the whole motion at one time.
Now we're having the same debate all over again, and I would put it to you that the only purpose of that debate is to protract the process, and that is not legitimate. Therefore, I would request that you utilize your prerogative to say that it's time to call the question.