We've identified here—and we believe it is a very serious problem—the high levels of turnover and the investment that is made in people who then maybe move to other departments or maybe go to the private sector. It is a major cost to the taxpayers and a major impediment to our being able to provide a functional public service. We would certainly like the issue of turnover to be part of any planning process; otherwise, it seems to me that the planning process is going to be functionally irrelevant.
Geographic location is certainly a factor. How do we ensure that we're not just blowing smoke here, and that some deputy department head somewhere along the line looks at a list of seven or eight criteria and says we'd better tick that box off and look at this before making a decision?