First of all, I do not agree with the amendment. I would just like to remind the committee that we studied real property management after the sale of federal government buildings. At that time, there was discussion of leasing buildings, but when we were studying the file, we did not know that there were legal proceedings between Public Works and Mr. Michael Rosenberg.
I think that this raises questions about the decisions made when the buildings were sold, eight, if memory serves. I feel that it is important that the committee is able to return to this file so that we can get to the bottom of the story. So our motion also refers to leasing buildings, to private management and—and these are strong words—to dirty little secrets that were kept from us.