Here's my final question. We've looked at the sale of the buildings to Larco, but we know there's a phase two involving about 40 buildings. When you look through the list of those buildings, the audacity of this plan to give away, to sell off, federal buildings that are key assets for us as a country is breathtaking.
You say it's ideological; I think it's idiotic. It might be ideological, but it seems to me idiotic. I can't see the benefit to the taxpayer at the end of the day.
Is that the experience you've seen from Australia--that this was simply an ideological exercise in selling off public assets to anyone who came along and wanted to grab them up?