Okay.
I've read what was provided to us, and I'm looking at a memo by you, Mr. Chartrand, dated October 26, concerning what this contract provision allowed for and didn't allow for. In your memo to city officials you said that
The right to extend the closing date is expressly reserved for the benefit of the two parties to the Project Agreement. It was not designed to give the Treasury Board the right to delay the closing date for the purpose of allowing the new Council to revisit the decision of the existing Council. [...] Neither of the parties to the contract would be able to use the extension clause in the way that Treasury Board is using it. The extension clauses are being used for a purpose that was not envisioned in the contract.
Again, were you surprised by this extraordinary interference in the contract by John Baird in the middle of an election campaign?