Yes. So my inclination would be to say no, because Parliament is empowered or able to provide all the instructions it wishes to in the legislation proactively or prospectively. So Parliament speaks and then the executive branch carries out those instructions.
If there is something that Parliament has in mind, it is free to do that by enacting or amending legislation. Once that legislation is enacted, I believe it's necessary for effective and efficient implementation to give significant leeway to the executive branch, to the Governor in Council, in deciding how office-holders are appointed and removed.
I say that only because it's not the case that the Governor in Council has totally unfettered discretion or is unsupervised. The judiciary is there to intervene in cases where there are abuses of power.