That's absolutely correct. The amendment to the legislation could be specific in terms of a particular agency or tribunal--for example, VIA Rail, the Privacy Commission, the Copyright Board, or the Nuclear Safety Commission--or such measures could be taken on a level that's more broadly applicable. That would apply to all public office-holders rather than the particular office-holder. If you decide that Parliament should play a more active monitoring or consultative role in the appointment and removal process, the question to decide is whether it ought to be specific to the particular office-holder or be in general to all office-holders.
On March 6th, 2008. See this statement in context.