Merci, Madame.
I would like to ask you a question. I want to take a different tack and look at a different part of this. It has more to do with the independence of the quasi-judicial body that is formed and its relationship with a minister.
I wonder to what extent a minister has the right or the obligation to intervene in the work of a quasi-judicial body. We've seen in the past ministers resign for writing a letter to the Immigration and Refugee Board about a case. We've seen other ministers resign for having called a judge.
What happens in a case of an independent, quasi-judicial body and its relationship? Who has the right to order that body to do something that is perhaps not within its jurisdiction or that it disagrees with?
This is the question that I think is crucial in this point, because obviously Parliament was the one that had to order the judicial body to do something. I don't think the government had the right to do it, but I don't know.
Perhaps you can answer me on that particular aspect--of the Keen case and of any other case, for that matter.