I was just talking to my colleague Mr. Warkentin, who is getting a new roof, and he was telling me it is going to cost him $7,000. And I realize these buildings are a lot bigger and more significant. And Chris isn't doing the work himself, either.
From a taxpayers' perspective, you always get a little concerned when you see figures that large. When you hear that $36 million has already been spent, and looking at the cost.... Why are these figures so significant? Is there extra cost because of the historical nature of the buildings, or security costs? Maybe you could expand upon that a little bit.