Just to throw into the mix—and again, we don't have to have all this hammered out for a meeting—if we're looking at terms and a vision on this, I'd like to get a sense also, are we seeing extreme turnovers in certain areas of the country as compared to others?
My gut feeling tells me that when you have federal government buildings in the regions, you have very low turnover and you have a very stable workforce. So, again, we might be able to make recommendations. Are we putting more resources into areas where we train people up and they're spinning and moving all the time and we're always throwing more money at it, as opposed to other operations in various parts of the country where it might be very stable and they're actually much more effective?
So that would be a good piece of the puzzle to have a handle on.