I appreciate that you don't want to comment on the policy aspect. You were able to comment on it when there was this process, but you weren't advised in advance of this decision.
My concern is that if you're going to have independence from the government, if you're going to have the opportunity to fully exercise your duties, is this not a first example of how the government is placing restrictions on your ability to do your job? I can't make any sense of this. Isn't this an opportunity to say that if you're going to be an independent officer, you need to be able to have a full rein here to be able to look into areas of concern and to be able to examine all elements of procurement?