I didn't know if it was clearly defined or if that was just a bit of a catch-all opportunity. That's fine; you gave me a response on that.
Building on Mr. Holland's point, and I think it was a valid point, you gave a number of the reasons why there would be cause for either judgment or justification either for allowance or denial of particular issues. Of those, have you found any real common denominators? Are there any patterns or trends that clearly could be identified? As an example, we as legislators could say there's a definitive problem in one particular area; we're having an issue that's coming back again and again and again, and it could be due to regulatory requests, demands, desires, etc. Have you found any consistency there, or are you sort of hit-and-miss depending on how things are going?